For history 383 –
Reconstruction era marriage and divorce patterns in Mississippi.
The majority of my primary sources would be precedent-setting Court cases, although I could also search the archives for letters, diaries, and the like. Other legal miscellanea, such as correspondence, motions, and memorandum, could also serve as primary sources if only I could get my hands on such.
For sociology 455 –
Race, Gender, and Otherization.
I still have a lot to consider here. This is on the verge of being yet another “broad, overarching idea” !
For SHI –
The pictorial representation of female musicians: a Racial analysis
This seems like precisely the thing that would go over very well at the Bunche Institute.
______________________________________________________
I’m suddenly struck by the realization (and the thought: why didn’t I think of that sooner?) of a contradiction inherent of academia. Scholarship is said to be built upon the sharing of ideas – the recitation and criticism of other’s ideas. Why, then, is there the pressure to come up with “original scholarship”?
