assimilation

I have witnessed the presence of different cultures all my life. In the cultural milleau of South Florida, I had the good fortune to grow up among a diverse population of black and brown Carribean islanders, Jews from the Eastern Seaboard, and brown people from Asia, the Middle East, and other far-flung locales – all interspersed with black and white Americans. I have always found cultural diversity interesting and intriguing. I believe it was partly this exposure to so many different cultures in my formative years that I quickly and easily learned of the mutability of culture and the subjectivity of morality. For this happenstance I am forever grateful to the Universe.

Only when I moved to Mississippi, at the tender age of sixteen, did I come to realize that what I embraced as cultural diversity was associated by others many with fear and malice. Here in the stagnant swamp of the Great River, the vast social divisions are drawn along strict color lines. Race is a potent, narcotic feature of the cultural landscape in this place. Now, at the age of twenty five I find myself deeply immersed in this Mississippian black-and-white abyss, and yet I’m compelled to dive deeper before migrating to the Cold White North.

My undergraduate post-secondary Liberal Arts education at a Historically Black College has profoundly shaped my world view in a way that inspires my scholastic endeavors. To that end I shall travel this summer to UCLA to study the connections between institutionalized racism, ethnocentrism, and the formalization of the disciplines of anthropology and sociology. My research is being supported by the Ralph Bunche Center for African American Studies. This fall, I shall extend my tenure at JSU to encompass graduate studies there until the designated time for the Big Move in summer 2009.

I’m eagerly anticipating the Summer Research Institute experience. There are many reasons for this: I’ve never before lived in a “dorm” situation before, and I’ve never been so far away from my husband for such an extended amount of time. If the demographic of participants of previous years is any indication, I’ll likely be the only white girl in the Humanities program, and I’ve chosen not to disclose my race to the University. As my career progresses, I’m continuously convinced that navigating the socio-cultural landscape of academia shall indeed prove a worthwhile occupational endeavor.

Published in: on April 14, 2008 at 9:09 pm Leave a Comment

research ideas 1.19.08

For history 383 –

Reconstruction era marriage and divorce patterns in Mississippi.
The majority of my primary sources would be precedent-setting Court cases, although I could also search the archives for letters, diaries, and the like. Other legal miscellanea, such as correspondence, motions, and memorandum, could also serve as primary sources if only I could get my hands on such.   

For sociology 455 –

Race, Gender, and Otherization.
I still have a lot to consider here. This is on the verge of being yet another “broad, overarching idea” !

For SHI –

The pictorial representation of female musicians: a Racial analysis
This seems like precisely the thing that would go over very well at the Bunche Institute.

______________________________________________________

I’m suddenly struck by the realization (and the thought: why didn’t I think of that sooner?)  of a contradiction inherent of academia. Scholarship is said to be built upon the sharing of ideas – the recitation and criticism of other’s ideas. Why, then, is there the pressure to come up with “original scholarship”?

an interdisciplinary perspective

During my sociology 455 class today I realized that I must find a way to coalesce some of the various assorted branches of the humanities (namely history, sociology, and anthropology) through the course of my future scholastic endeavors.

My genius idea about classifying gender and race as socio-cultural technologies seems to fit nicely with a functionalist sociological framework, although I was not consciously aware of that when I came upon the idea in the brambles of my mind.

I’m wondering if and how the ideas of latent and manifest functions, and dysfunctions, might be applied to this idea, but I have a good feeling that this course will point me in the right direction. That is, if it doesn’t outright provide an explanation/answer…

Published in: on January 14, 2008 at 10:29 pm Leave a Comment

the wrong approach

Last night I had an epiphany: I realized where I’d gone wrong with this blog! I had thought of blogging here as a chore, and associated it with something I needed to be doing as a conscientious aspiring scholar, but I now see that that was all wrong, because this blog isn’t a chore at all; it is a tool!

Yay for me for discovering this.

I have now officially begin my last semester as an undergraduate, on a good note, too. Good, that is, other than the fact that my first class of the semester – Logic – didn’t meet because of a tornado warning.The five classes which will round out my undergraduate studies are: (1) Logic, (2) Contemporary US History, (3) Sociology 455 or, Race and Ethnic Relations, (4) Creative Writing, and (5) Women in US History. So far it’s shaping up to be an interesting semester. I’ll have to get to write a lot, which will be a fulfilling challenge that will allow me to expand and hone my skills as an academic. No worries, just learning new stuff.

The two things I must fret about now are: (1) the GRE, and (2) my UCLA application.

I’m struggling to come up with a feasible research topic. My mind seems stuck in broad, overarching-theme-mode, and I don’t know where to pare down. An alumnus of the institute advised me that the research doesn’t have to be self-contained, that it can be part of a larger research project, which is encouraging indeed.

Race and Gender are what I’m stuck on. Specifically, the ways that race and gender are both used to oppress segments of society. These two — for lack of a better description — soci-cultural technologies have profoundly shaped the course of history. This seems so obvious to me that I don’t know where to begin to try to prove it.

Then the thought of socio-cultural technology brings me back to that other historical truth that I have convinced myself of: that human culture – and, accordingly, its myriad assorted mechanism and functions – is a technological innovation just like any other that had made our existence on earth that much easier and efficient-in-a-primitive-sort-of-way.

So I’ve much to mull over.

In the meanwhile I need to do a little sociology 101 review.

the beauty of speed

Today’s word is demagogue. A demagogue is an orator who appeals to his audience’s passions and prejudices.

Perhaps the country will have enough sense not to elect a demagogue as our next President.

I can’t believe it’s been almost a month since I last posted. Time flies when you’re super busy I suppose.

It’s not as if I have any time to post anything of substance right now, although there’s much news to be shared as many developments have occurred in my academic world since last I posted.

Alas, updates will have to wait, for I have my first mid-term exam tomorrow and sleep is very necessary if I hope to do well.

Wish me luck. Hopefully I’ll make time for another new post before another month goes by…

Published in: on October 16, 2007 at 10:31 pm Leave a Comment

strange day, more on the way

Today’s word is quisling. A quisling is an eponym, from Vidkun Quisling, a Norwegian army officer who betrayed Norway to the Nazis. Quisling, as a noun, therefore means a traitor or collaborator. It also strikes me as an awesome scrabble word.

The president would never pardon a quisling.

That’s a crappy sentence, but it was either that or “Scooter Libby is a quisling which I couldn’t bring myself to post (even though I just did). Oh well.

Today was an interesting day on campus. When I arrived at 7:50-something the hallways were dark and hot, however, my 8:00 class had lights, so we proceeded to take our exam as scheduled. Finishing my exam well before 8:50 I left the dark liberal arts building to kill some time in the library, which had lights and a/c. When 9:00 rolled around I made my way back to liberal arts, which was still dark and deserted. My 9:00 class wasn’t fortunate enough to have lights, so it did not meet, and so I trekked back to the library. By the time 10:00 rolled around the light situation was fixed in liberal arts, although the a/c didn’t seem to be working correctly. So, after one successful class period I figure my 11:00 class will meet without a problem, but that was not to be the case. Either we had a fire drill or some foolish person pulled the fire alarm, causing the entire building to evacuate and wait outside in the steadily rising temperatures for security to inspect the building and okay our re-entry. By the time we got settled in our classroom only 15 minutes remained for the professor to lecture.

Need I say that it felt like a wasted day?

Not that I wasted the downtime this morning; I’m ahead of the game as far as reading and homework, which is something at least.

In other news, I have an appointment with my adviser on Thursday to discuss my upcoming graduation (yay!), but I also want to talk to her about either obtaining a minor in sociology if I could squeeze all of the requirements into one more semester, or possibly obtaining a second Bachelor’s Degree if I could squeeze all of the requirements into three more semesters. It will really depend on the terms of my PTK scholarship. I know it would cover one additional semester, but the fine print seems to indicate that it will cover a total of six semesters. This being my third semester, I could conceivably continue on for three more semesters without paying any tuition. The thing I’m not sure about is whether it will allow me those three additional semesters in pursuit of a second degree. I’m going to call tomorrow about this so I’ll have that part answered before I go meet with my adviser. Chances are, though, if I’m seeking a second degree from another department, my history department adviser won’t really be able to help and I’ll have to seek the assistance of an adviser from the sociology department.

More details later, but the whole idea of extra time at JSU has occurred to me because I’m starting to feel as if I won’t be ready to move half-way across the country in less than a year. And while I hate the thought of putting off my graduate studies, if I could do it in such a way that I would be going in more prepared than I would if I jumped in right away, I feel like I should take my time and line up all my ducks in a tidy row, so to speak.

Right now, though, it would be in my best interest to stop writing, stop thinking, stop worrying, and get some rest.

Published in: on September 17, 2007 at 9:42 pm Leave a Comment

five new classes

Today’s word is invidious. Invidious is an adjective that implies the presence of prejudice. Invidious is synonymous with discriminatory.

As a minority at a historically black university I’m no stranger to invidious stares.

The semester continues to go smoothly and, as luck would have it, an exam has been postponed such that I can now make the time to post in detail about my new classes. They are, in the order that I attend them, as follows:

Word Power: As you might guess, this is an English vocab-building class. We began with a chapter on diction, which has proven both easy and helpful thus far. I’ll be the first to admit that, while I have better diction skills than the majority of my peers, there is certainly room for improvement. Something tells me that the rest of the semester will continue in this manner. I hope to get as much out of it as possible, and I believe it will prove to be an excellent grad school prep class.
My professor is Mr. Feazele (he hasn’t implied that he holds a Ph.D., and does not refer to himself as “Dr.” so I believe I’m correct in referring to him as “Mr.”). He is my lone white professor this semester. He has a tendency to ramble, but I can hardly hold that against him because the subject of words can be quite boring without a little deviation here and there.

Cultural Anthropology: This class is, of course, a social-science class. It is much as the name implies: an introductory course to cultural anthropology (as opposed to biological, archaeological, or linguistic anthropology). Seeing as how I was recently considering graduate studies in archaeological anthropology I believe that this class will also prove valuable for my future scholastic endeavors. For this class, in lieu of a final exam, I must create a personal artifact. This will require some serious consideration.
My professor for this class is Dr. Taylor. She is an adjunct professor which, as best I can tell, means she only teaches part-time and has a real job somewhere else. She’s from the North East U.S. but she has taught and/or studied in many other parts of the world. She is very serious, but still manages to teach in an engaging manner. I think we’ll get along just fine.

Cultural Geography: This class is actually offered by my own department, the History Department. It seems like it will be an interesting angle for a geography class, and with the emphasis on cultural diversity, it seems to be right up my alley. I’ve been placed in a study group with ten other folks and assigned the country of Nigeria for my cultural research. That research will extend out of the classroom and immerse me into the native culture (as much as possible). The dual requirements of the out-of-class research are to attend a religious service and eat at a restaurant that most closely resembles the native religion and cuisine of our country. This should prove interesting since, due to a lack of Nigerian religion and cuisine, we’ll be improvising as best we can with the professor’s blessing.
My professor for this class is Dr. Thompson. She only teaches two classes because she also serves as the Director of the Center for Student Professional Development, which offers a mentorship-tutorial program that I have joined. I like Dr. Thompson because it is obvious from her demeanor that she is genuinely concerned about her students and wants them to do their best.

Introduction to Political Science: Another social science course. I hope to get a lot out of this class, too, although I despise the textbook. It’s difficult to explain, but there’s just something about the way it’s written that confuses and frustrates me. Being the conscientious student that I am, however, I purchased myself two supplemental books for cheap on the internet, and I’ve been making do in the meanwhile by consulting Wikipedia. So far this hasn’t resulted in any tragedies; only time will tell if I’ll out of there with an A by doing it this way.
My professor for this class is Dr. Ighoavada. He is from Nigeria, but he’s been here for over thirty years. He’s very passionate and I genuinely enjoy his lectures, but I have to pay very close attention to understand what he’s trying to convey.

Introduction to Philosophy: This is another class offered by my own department, the History (and Philosophy) Department. And this is another class that I will thoroughly enjoy. I’ve considered myself an amateur philosopher for many years, and now, at long last I have the opportunity to gain some formal training on the matter. This will certainly prove advantageous for my future in academia.
My professor for this class is Dr. Banks. He is a reverend, but his teaching is not biased by his faith, and for that he has my utmost respect. He is also a passionate lecturer, and I believe we will have an enjoyable semester.

And those are my classes. I truly feel that this semester will help me to grow academically, and thoroughly prepare me for graduate school. Each semester I spend at JSU I feel more at home there and I’m quite sure that by the time I arrive an unknown grad school in the great white north I’ll be missing the time spent here.

Alas, as I continue to write the hour grows ever later, but 6am patiently awaits with no regard for how much sleep I get and, considering that I have my first exam of the semester at 8am, I’d be well served to call it quits and get some rest.

Published in: on September 6, 2007 at 9:46 pm Leave a Comment

so it begins

You didn’t think that when I introduced a word-of-the-day that it would mean I literally post a word every day, did you? If you did, my friend, I’m afraid you were mistaken. What I meant by word-of-the-day was that I would include a word each day that I have time to make a blog post. I hope this clears things up for anyone who was eagerly awaiting the next word… not that any such a person exists, anyway. I know this is true because WordPress’ blog stats reflect only one visitor to this blog in the last month. That’s okay, though, since I’m actually writing this for my own benefit. It’s like an old-fashioned pen-and-paper journal, written for the sake of writing and not for the sake of reading.

And now, on to today’s word. Today’s word is consanguineous. Cosanguineous is an adjective that describes a blood relation.

This weekend I will have consanguineous visitors.

The new semester is off to a smooth start. I believe I’ll thoroughly enjoy all of my classes that I’ve thus far attended. The only class I have yet to attend is my philosophy 101 class, which meets only once a week on Thursday evening, and since classes started last Friday, this Thursday will be the first meeting of that class.

Once I’ve been to all of my classes I’ll post my impressions and expectations of each. In the meanwhile, I have studying to do if I hope to stay ahead.

Published in: on August 28, 2007 at 6:35 pm Leave a Comment

new semester’s eve

Tomorrow marks the official beginning of my last semester as an undergraduate. Yay!

As for today, we shall skip the pleasantries and get straight to the word of the day: quotidian. Quotidian is an adjective which refers to something that is found in the course of ordinary events; that which is ordinary or commonplace.

This day has been quotidian in every way.

Although I did have a conversation that resulted in some food for thought…

Husband and I were discussing computers and microchips and transistors. Before long the conversation had moved to digital vs. analog computing. The interesting conclusions reached were (1) I am an analog computer, and (2) digital technology represents one of those revolutions that will forever change the way humans exist.

Both of these ideas demand further consideration and investigation.

Published in: on August 23, 2007 at 8:47 pm Leave a Comment

making progress

In an effort to prepare myself for the vocab section of the GRE I’m going to begin posting a word-of-the-day for the next several weeks. The words I’ll post first are words I encountered and did not know while reading Mysteries of Sex: Tracing Women and Men Through American History.

Today’s word is: augur. Augur is most commonly used as a verb, in which form it has two meanings: (1) to indicate by signs, and (2) to predict from an omen. As a noun, augur describes a religious official who interpreted omens to guide public policy in Ancient Rome. Closely related is the word augury which is a noun that describes an event that is experienced as indicating important things to come.

My score on the GRE will augur my grad school fate.

This morning I spent some time wandering around campus taking care of new-semester business. Now I’m all set and ready to begin classes on Friday. Yay!

Published in: on August 22, 2007 at 10:11 am Leave a Comment

Socio-Cultural Technologies

In keeping with my new theory, I’ve been noticing instances of socio-cultural technologies everywhere. Here’s a preliminary list I’ve gathered:

  • gender roles
  • religious dogma
  • eugenics
  • race
  • kinship systems
  • nationalism
Published in: on July 15, 2007 at 6:16 pm Leave a Comment

Trees break the sidewalk

And the sidewalk skins my knees

I’ve been doing a lot of thinking since the semester has ended (and not enough reading of bound, properly published materials – although I’ve certainly been doing enough online, digital materials), and I believe that I want to pursue my graduate studies in the history of science and society.

It makes perfect sense! For what is agriculture, and the social changes that accompanied agriculture – which so facinate me! – but a case study in the ancient history of science and society? Research avenues would abound, and the field would give me room to study ancient technologies as well as more contemorary technological phenomena.

I have this idea to redefine technology to include not only material adaptations made by humanity, but also less tangible adaptations, specifically, socio-cultural technology. And I wonder, is this allowed? Hasn’t someone else thought of this before? And, if they have, can I find a unique perspective?

Obviously, socio-cultural technology and material technology are intimately connected to one another. These relationships are what I want to study, but I have to pick a single inquiry that I can realistically pursue within the context of a master’s thesis. . .
I think the next step is to arrange a metting with the professor who first introduced me to the history of science and society to ponder potential research topics. . .

Published in: on June 9, 2007 at 9:11 pm Leave a Comment